[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- To: Chris Hubick <maillist@chris.hubick.com>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 11:13:47 +0100 (BST)
> This would mean that the grammer has PE
> references in places that are not allowed in the internal subset,
Yes; a document must satisfy the grammar rules and the constraints.
> suggesting those are only valid in the external subset, yet the
> grammer leaves them out in many places where they are allowed in the
> external subset!
Earlier drafts of the standard attempted to indicate where paramater
entities could occur by special syntax in the grammar rules. This made
them very hard to read.
I think that to do this right would need two grammars; one for the
unexpanded source and one for the result after expansion.
-- Richard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|