[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
- To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@textuality.com>, "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:53:31 +0100
O.k. Understood
Thanks for clearing that up for me.
Peter Jones
WebDev Technical Editor
Wrox Press
mailto:peterj@wrox.com
***************
Wrox Press UK Ltd.
http://www.wrox.co.uk
Tel 44 121 706 6826
Fax 44 121 706 2967
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Bray [SMTP:tbray@textuality.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 06, 1998 2:51 PM
>To: Peter Jones; 'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'
>Subject: Re: White space
>
>At 01:48 PM 8/6/98 +0100, Peter Jones wrote:
>>The value "default" signals that applications' default white space
>>processing modes are acceptable for this element..."
>>
>>This is then opposed to the value "preserve" which preserves whitespace
>>for the element. Which suggests that the default processing is
>>normalization of whitespace.
>>
>>But according to the first line above, the default XML processing is
>>preservation of whitespace. So what is the default mode of the
>>processor?
>>Preserve or not?
>
>xml:space has no effect on the behavior of the *processor* - the
>processor always has to pass through all the white space. It is a
>signal from the document author to the *application*, and if it
>has any effect (not guaranteed) that would be on the behavior of
>the application. -T.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
