[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- To: XML Dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 11:24:48 -0400
Tim Bray wrote:
> Well, the spec is not perfect, but it makes it pretty clear that the
> above, while you may wish to apply the English word "document" to it,
> is not, in the terms of the spec, an "XML Document", and that a
> conforming XML Processor would emit some serious complaints when fed
> this particular character sequence. -T.
Of course. A simple fix would be to add a sentence to clause 2.1,
somewhat as follows: "It is a fatal error for a document not to
match the production _document_."
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
