Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: len bullard <email@example.com>
- To: David Megginson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 22:23:20 -0500
David Megginson wrote:
> As far as I may be allowed to compare tropical and temperate tree
> fruit, the equivalent of a Java class is a complete XML document.
Class or an object of a class? Even that is not great. Colonized
namespaces can contain property values from different classes of objects
in a single document yes? To me as an SGMLer, a colonized document
*looks like* an SGML document with multiple doctype statements.
> The problem is that we don't have a good name for a collection of XML
> documents working tightly together, the way that a collection of Java
> classes can work in an applet or application -- "web" seems too loose,
> and "docuverse" seems too New-Age. Any suggestions?
I call them aggregates but I think of that from a process point of view.
When I look at a colonized file, I think of weaving together different
document types into an aggregate type, loosely a collection.
A 3D model would help.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)