OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: To validate or not to validate, that is the question

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
  • To: "xml-dev@ic.ac.uk" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:33:27 +0200

Martin Bryan wrote:
> Let me see if I can suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune and
> pose you all a question: "Why do compound documents need to be validated as
> a whole?"

my minimum concern is to be able to default attributes.

> ...
> If I create my document fragments using the relevant DTDs, I validate them
> against those DTDs, not against a compound DTD. Once they have been
> validated against the DTD I can import them into a compound document as
> already validated fragments.

i am working with document entities in which "references" are made to elements
from various sources. if they use enabling architectures, then the mixed
references are within a single tag.

> ...
> Why does this group seem to feel there is an overpowering need to develop a
> DTD that can be used to validate the compound structure, rather than its
> individual fragments?

it's actually the defaults i'm after.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS