[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 08:31:27 -0400
Peter Jones writes:
> In the XML 1.0 spec there is a well-formedness constraint upon the
> document which reads, "Each of the parsed entities which is referenced
> directly or indirectly within the document is well-formed."
>
> Does this mean
> A) That a well-formed document can contain <!ENTITY...> declarations
> without ceasing to be merely a well-formed doc and becoming a
> validatable one?
All valid documents must be well-formed; or, in other words, anything
allowed in a valid document is by definition allowed in a well-formed
document (or else the valid document would fail to be well-formed).
Well-formedness is simply a lower level of syntactic checking for a
document; it is not a restricted subset of XML.
> B) Indeed, such declarations must be made within the base document
> for any entity reference (not directly accessible as supplied with
> the computer's OS) to avoid violating the well-formedness
> constraint?
I am not certain that I really understand the question.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|