[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 18:57:46
At 13:12 05/09/98 +0200, Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>
>I've never felt that this was a difficult choice. For links inside the
>document where you can count on IDs to be present, use IDREF, for
>external links, links to arbitrary elements (or with even finer
>granularity if required) use XPointer.
I have also struggled gently with this and - at present - tend not to use
IDREF at all. The only - but valuable - benefit of IDREF is that it
requires the parser to check presence of IDs. However I believe that the
XLink approach is not to use IDREF for href so that IDREF cannot be used
with XLink. Since XLink is a cornerstone of much of what I do, I can't see
that I should use IDREF. Is this reasonable?
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
