[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
- To: Bill la Forge <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 04:54:49 -0400
Bill la Forge wrote:
> I think it is important to distinguish between enabling software and
> product.
>
> The W3C DOM is a technology enabler. A high-speed implementation is a
> product. The Docuverse SDK is something in between. Call it an expedient?
>
> I have been wrestling with these concepts for a while myself. I'd like to
> see the Coins api widly adopted. So I've tried to make use of common api
> (SAX and DOM), rather than provide a propriatary one. But I am driven by a
> need to make a profit. I hope to do this by charging a reasonable price for
> related development tools.
>
> The bet that I am making is that Coins will become widespread and that I can
> make a reasonable profit selling those tools for $99.
I haven't looked at coins too much in the last 5 months myself, but it seems
like a useful tool for building parameter-driven applications that if put behind
a big name software label could easily sell for $999 a seat. The biggest
failure of a lot of software companies is being indecisive with pricing. Either
you go for high-volume, low-margins in a general market, or else you go for
low-value, high-margins in a niche market. Low-level tools like parsers
generally sell in the high-volume market, while high-level software like Coins I
would think is more of a niche application that some organizations would pay
top-dollar for. On the other end of the spectrum, if you could prove to people
that parameter-driven application development is far superior to traditional
application development, then Coins may become much more pervasive allowing you
to lower-the price of coins and go for volume.
On a sidenote to coins, an individual developer named Jack Harich who hangs out
on the Advanced-Java mailing list (I am sure you are familiar with it) has done
a lot of personal research on stuff that is right up the alley of what I
perceive coins to be. Maybe you two should correspond. I remember someone
referring Jack to your work before, so maybe you two have already corresponded.
Tyler
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
