Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:42:57 -0500
Tim Bray wrote:
> I repeat: all this noise about the difficulty of validation is
> completely missing the real point, namely we have neither a theoretical
> basis nor industry experience to guide us in constructing and using
> compound schemas (DTDs or any other sort), and doing partial validation.
I believe that we have both industry experience AND a formal model.
The industry experience is that people can build compound schemas by
combining schema parts through *parameter* entities. I highlight the word
*parameter* because it is the hint to how a more robust solution must
work: it must parameterize content models and schema fragments. The
problem with parameter entities is that they are way too flexible because
they work at a textual level. We have the right model, but the wrong
mechanism. So to move beyond that, we must implement parameterization in a
more structured sense.
The so-called "module proposal" did the same thing with SGML DTD syntax.
(it uses a not-sufficient-constrained variety of parameter entities,
The formal model is the forest automata theory. See:
This post shows how to do parameterization and composition.
Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
The past is inaccurate. Whoever lives long enough knows how much what he
had seen with his own eyes becomes overgrown with rumor, legend a
magnifying or belittling hearsay. "It was not like that at all!" --
he would like to exclaim, but will not, for they would have seen only
his moving lips without hearing his voice. - Czeslaw Milosz (translated)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)