[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Deke Smith <deke@tallent.com>
- To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 98 10:30:46 -0500
John Cowan, cowan@locke.ccil.org said on 9/23/98 10:02 AM:
>ISO-10646-UCS-2 is near enough UTF-16; UTF-16 only implies that
>surrogates are correctly processed, and decent UCS-2 implementations
>will at worst leave surrogates alone.
And what is the implications of this (if any) for XML rendering? I'm not
sure of what you mean by "surrogates are correctly processed."
Thanks for everyone's answers. They have helped.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Deke Smith
Tallent Communications Group, Brentwood TN
deke@tallent.com, 615-661-9878
-----------------------------------------------------------------
" The best way to predict the future is to invent it. "
- Alan Kay
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|