[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
- To: cowan@locke.ccil.org
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:42:04 -0500
[John Cowan:]
> > If FPIs and/or URNs should *not* be used for referencing offline
> > information produced by unregistered authorities, then what should?
>
> They should be so used, but not as you propose using them, I think.
You oppose the solution I have proposed. OK, I understand that, and I
think I understand why, too. (I also note with interest that my
approach is already supported by the URN draft, using the "x-"
prefix.)
But what is the correct solution, in your mind? The only alternative
I know of is the HyTime "bibloc" architectural form. In your opinion,
John, should there be a similar architectural form (in XML jargon,
"template") in XML? Or do you have another proposal for indicating
bibliographic references?
-Steve
--
Steven R. Newcomb, President, TechnoTeacher, Inc.
srn@techno.com http://www.techno.com ftp.techno.com
voice: +1 972 231 4098 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 0004 x137)
fax +1 972 994 0087 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 3152)
3615 Tanner Lane
Richardson, Texas 75082-2618 USA
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
