[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@erols.com>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 07:27:30 -0700
At 07:33 AM 9/30/98 -0400, Samuel R. Blackburn wrote:
>It seems to me that one of the first problems programmers
>encounter is XML's inability to handle "binary" data....
>If we could turn back the clock to before 19980210 and get
>rid of design goal #3, handling binary data could have been
>so easily handled by adding one element attribute. If the
>XML spec had included one predefined attribute called
>"xml:length" binary data would have been a no-brainer to
>handle. Here's an example:
It seems to me that using base64 handles this in a much
more robust and forgiving way.
>Will XML 2.0 handle binary data? Is XML 2.0 on the drawing
>boards yet?
No and no. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
