Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <email@example.com>
- To: "XML Dev" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:28:01 -0500
At 05:16 PM 9/30/98 +0200, Michel Biezunski wrote:
>>As an aside, I note that much of this discussion revolves around issues of
>>the definitions of key terms in the discussion, which is, of course, one of
>>the purposes of topic navigation maps: to define things.
>Topic Navigation Maps do ***_NOT_**** define things. They (only!) offer a
>of interchanging whatever somebody says about something, including
>if any. They can be used even when no definitions are involved.
But doesn't the act of associating a name with mentions of that name (a
topic to its members) serve to define what the topic means to the creator
of the topic?
As I have always understood topic maps, they serve to relate topics. A
topic is a named idea that is an opinion about some thing. I can't talk
about a thing until I define what I mean by that thing, which is what a
For example, if I create the topic "Lake Geneva" and connect it to the
latitude and longitude of a body of water in Switzerland, I have defined
what I mean by "Lake Geneva" in the context of this particular topic map.
W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer
ISOGEN International Corp.
2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202. 214.953.0004
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)