[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: <david@megginson.com>, "Jonathan A. Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:54:29 -0700
At 12:34 PM 9/30/98 -0400, david@megginson.com wrote:
>Quite right. Right now, XML 1.0 has notations for this purpose, as
>Eliot keeps reminding us; it would also be possible to invent a
>standard attribute like 'xml:content', for use whether or not an
>element's content was Base64-encoded:
Yeah, but NOTATIONs require the use of a validating processor, and
lots of non-validating apps would like to use base64. Having said
that, I think that your proposed xml:content is more or less exactly
what NOTATION is for? -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
