[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 01:06:41 +0800
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
>Suppose I wrote up a NOTE, should occupy less than one page, proposing
>a reserved attribute xml:packed with, for the moment, only two
>allowed values, "none" and "base64".
Could this be viewed as merely a predefined notation attribute and notation?
In other words, would it be true to say that what you are suggesting could
be achieved right now with notation attributes and notations, the only
problem is you'd need a DTD and a validating (or "DTD-aware") parser and you
are wanting to avoid this requirement?
James Tauber
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|