[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Michael Ax <ax@href.com>
- To: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 03:03:08 -0700
Hi Don, thanks for trying, but I don't think you're really speaking to my
questions here!
>1. Using XML just for describing the structure of the data makes no sense
>because you can not use generic XML tools to process the data.
hence my observations re filters and oo file systems.
>2. Compression reduces file size difference to 10%-30%.
3rd nf reduces log files by 16:1 without compression.
>3. Cost of 10 Gig drives will be considerablly less by the time server
>vendors stop supporting legacy log formats.
n* 4++ will still be far more
>4. Due to the Y2K problem, concerns for compactness is equated with
>shortsightedness these days.
by whom?
-
Cheers,
Michael
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
