[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: emberson@faslab.com (Richard Emberson)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:24:41 -0700
Concerning validation, in section 3 it states:
An element is valid if there is a declaration matching
elementdecl where the Name matches the element type
and also:
The declaration matches ANY, and the types of all child
elements have been declared.
Isn't the second condition redundant. If a child element has not been
declared then the validity violation will be caught the first statement.
Which is to say, if a child has not been declared, then when the
child element's text is being parsed, its lack of declaration will be
caught by a validating parser at that point and there is no need to
check for this at the parent element level.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|