Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 09:20:51 -0800
John Cowan wrote:
> DOM Level 1 is an ugly mess, and the only justification for it
> is to keep Netscape and Microsoft from implementing even uglier
> incompatible DOMs.
I think everyone recognizes some of the compromises that went
into DOM, and has a list of some mistakes they'd fix. But I
don't think there's a good consensus on which things are mistakes
rather than features ...
To put it differently: is there really room for another API
to represent XML structure?
I tend to think that DOM, warts and all, is "good enough" for
most purposes. And for those other purposes, I suspect that
no standard API could suit.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)