[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@technologist.com>
- To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:39:08 -0600
John Cowan wrote:
>
> 10. An XML processor (necessarily a non-validating one) that does
> not include the replacement text of an external parsed entity
> in place of an entity reference must notify the application that
> it recognized but did not read the entity (4.4.3) [SAX does not
> provide for this]
I think David agrees with me that XML processors do not have enough
information to make the decision about whether entity references should be
expanded or not. If an author wants an inter-entity reference that can be
expanded "lazily", they should use XLink and describe the behaviour they
want in a stylesheet.
Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
"The new revolutionaries believe the time has come for an aggressive
move against our oppressors. We have established a solid beachhead
on Friday. We now intend to fight vigorously for 'casual Thursdays.'
-- who says America's revolutionary spirit is dead?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|