Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David LeBlanc <email@example.com>
- To: "ML XMLDev" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 23:45:24 -0800
(standing well away from the opening as he opens Pandora's box)
Is there any group working or thinking about an XML 2.0 spec? Is XMLDev an
appropriate place to talk about such a thing?
Reading "Structuring XML" by David Megginson, I keep seeing things
mentioned that are in SGML that I wonder why they got left out of XML. They
don't appear to add undesired complexity to things and they do look like
they would add to the power and flexibility of the notation.
At a minimum, a couple of things i'd like to see are CDATA element content
and CDATA attribute content.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)