Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>
- To: XML-Dev Mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:48:12 -0500
At 11:26 AM 1/15/99 +1000, James Robertson wrote:
>Who decides which DTDs have sufficient merit/useage/stability/etc
>to warrant a registered subtype?
>It seems unrealistic to expect IETF to make those sort
>Or, to rephrase again:
>If I write a new DTD for (say) classifying house bricks,
>to be used in the building industry, and I go to to the
>IETF, and say:
> Give me a registered subtype!
>What should they do and say?
Same as they do for everyone else. See:
for details, unless it's been revised since. It doesn't look too painful.
Looking through my Netscape settings, it seems like the x- types are used
without too much concern. Unless you hit a naming conflict, registration
doesn't really matter. It doesn't seem like a large problem.
XML: A Primer / Cookies
Building XML Applications (March)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)