[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- To: "Tyler Baker" <tyler@infinet.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:15:21 -0500
If the validity of a standard is based on the process which defines it, I suspect that
the work done on xml-dev has the greater validity.
Open Source Software and vendor controlled standards bodies, IMHO, are a poor marrage.
The advantage of Java and XML is that they let you do significant work without the need
for a large team effort. Agreement and support of a few large vendors is no longer the
significant factor.
We need standards. But I suspect the process needs to be updated.
Bill
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
