Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "James Tauber" <email@example.com>
- To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 20:38:57 +0800
I'm starting to put some options into FOP that are triggered by processing
instructions. My initial thought was use 'fop' as the target.
But then it occurred to me: PI targets can be associated with a URI via a
NOTATION declaration. This is *a lot* like namespaces. Does that mean PI
targets should be arbitrary proxies?
Instead of looking for PIs with the target "fop" should I instead be looking
for PIs with the target which is a NOTATION declared with URI
After all, some other application might use the target "fop" but only mine
would use the NOTATION with URI http://www.jtauber.com/fop/.
What do people think?
James Tauber / email@example.com / www.jtauber.com
Associate Researcher, Electronic Commerce Network
Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com, www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)