[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
- To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 22:33:00 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
> You might even want to get fancy and allow <Title>, <Desc>, and
> <DDML:Doc> to be repeated with different values for xml:lang.
> Obviously, the information for (2) and (3) can be included in
> <DDML:Doc>, but since it has no standard structure, it is difficult to
> automatically generate menus, help-files, etc. for DTDs from a DDML
> description.
I agree that this information would be great for tools to have available.
One question (not about DDML in particular) regarding how to best use
xml:lang:
Should the DDML look something like:
<Title xml:lang="de">
Title in german
</Title>
<Desc xml:lang="de">
Description in german
</Desc>
<Title xml:lang="en">
Title in english
</Title>
<Desc xml:lang="en">
Description in english
</Desc>
etc...
or should one use something similar to:
<Title>
<if xml:lang="de">Title in german</if><if xml:lang="en">Title in
english</if>....
</Title>
<Desc>
<if xml:lang="de">Description in german</if><if xml:lang="en">Description
in english</if>
</Desc>
The latter seems in a sense "cleaner" to me, as the first one seems to have
a somewhat "bad influence" upon the DTD (enabling multiple Title elements
etc when it "logically" only should contain a single one, or does what
seems the most "logical" depend upon the perspective/application?)
Are there any consensus as to how to best handle this situation?
Cheers,
Jarle Stabell
Digital Logikk AS
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|