Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Chris Maden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:25:25 -0500 (EST)
> Roger L. Costello wrote:
> > I have a question about the ANY type. It is my understanding that
> > an element defined to be of type ANY can contain any element that
> > is defined *within* the DTD (i.e., it cannot use elements that are
> > not defined in the DTD). Correct?
> My advice to anyone is never accept a DTD that uses ANY. The only
> legimate use I have ever seen for it is in an interim DTD during
> data conversion. It's a sloppy use of a sloppy mechanism - for
> example, would you really want to support an infinite number of
> nested rdf:Description elements? There is no preventing this - even
> the DOCTYPE element can be nested within itself.
However, remember that a document type is composed of its formal
specification *and* its prose specification. Moreover, RDF is
explicitly intended for use with namespaces. The RDF DTD expresses
constraints among RDF elements; using ANY in the content model of its
root was a good idea, just like HyTime uses ANY for most of its
content models. Though I don't think the spec explicitly says so, RDF
is more akin to an architecture than to a document type, but without
the ability to rename element types.
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)