Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Richard Goerwitz <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:11:32 -0500
> > Actually, it's already a syntax error - S. 4.3.2 says that "An internal
> > parsed general entity is well-formed if its replacement text matches
> > <i>content</i>."
> Actually that's not quite right. The parsed entity is not
> well-formed, but that doesn't affect the well-formedness of the
> document unless the entity is referenced (section 2.1).
> > Do any of the available parsers indicate an error if &elt;
> > is not used in the document?
> Yes - the STG validator at http://www.stg.brown.edu/service/xmlvalid/
Here was our rationale:
If an entity is defined in such a way that, if used, it will always
generate an error, then it makes sense to let the user know about it.
Generally this situation reflects a problem with the DTD - in fact,
the worst kind of problem in the sense that it results in a DTD that
seems to work perfectly fine with some documents, but then suddenly
produces errors when somebody writes a document that actually uses
the entity in question.
It makes the DTD writer think that the error is in the document
(which, according to the standard, it is).
PGP key fingerprint: C1 3E F4 23 7C 33 51 8D 3B 88 53 57 56 0D 38 A0
For more info (mail, phone, fax no.): finger email@example.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)