Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David LeBlanc <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Paul Prescod <email@example.com>, "XML Developers' List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:16:31 -0800
I can, off the top of my head, think of lots of times where mixing elements
from other dtds would make sense. A few that sprang to mind:
Any kind of fiction (include a poem, recipe, formula etc).
News articles (ditto above).
Linguistics (include a fragment of text in a foreign language).
I know this isn't quite what Mr. Prescod had in mind (I think), but it
seems like a useful thing to be able to do. Why, if you include a
"poem.dtd" in another kind of document, couldn't you process the fragment
of the document (the poem or poems) in the "process space" (namespace?) of
that dtd or stylesheet or whatever?
At 12:45 PM 1/26/99 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote:
>Namespaces only make sense in a world where you can more or less randomly
>mix objects from different problem domains. That very seldom happens in
>the document world. It would require some way to dynamically assemble
>processing specifications (stylesheets). But the interaction between
>stylesheet levels is way too complex for this sort of dynamically assembly
>to be easy. We also know that dynamic assembly of schemas is quite tricky.
>As far as I know, nobody is doing it yet. So the namespace mechanism
>strikes me as premature considering that we don't have any infrastructure
>to take advantage of it.
> Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)