Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:36:39 -0000
> From: Matthew Sergeant (EML) [mailto:Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se]
> Server based XML processing
> XML processing is a
> resource hog. There's not really much you can do about it.
> Sure, you can use DCOM or Corba to distribute processing your XML across
> several servers - that's throwing hardware at the problem - not always the
> solution. You can use a persistent parsed structure like a DOM maintained
> in memory, but for some applications such as a rapidly changing XML
> this isn't always feasible (or is it?). Currently our web based XML
> system processes about 5 files per second (very subjective figures)...
How big are your XML files? My experience is that provided you split the
data up into "page-sized chunks" and only parse the data the user wants to
see, you can get much higher performance than this. Also, I've found that an
XML-to-HTML conversion that works in a serial pass using a SAX parser (with
SAXON, of course) is faster than anything that involves using a DOM or
de-serialising Java objects, and is negligible compared with the cost of
reading the XML from a relational database or interpreting an ASP script.
But of course, what's true with 2Kb XML files may not be true with 200Kb.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)