[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
- To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>,"'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 04:32:51 +0800
>In general there are very few answers in the spec. about what is
>"significant" or not. Where does it say that element order is significant?
>That's what the infoset group is all about.
>
>I would say that everything should be presumed significant until the
>infoset group says otherwise.
This also relates to the XML Canonicalization work. The order is significant
if it is preserved under canonicalization.
James
(not speaking for the canonicalization work)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
