[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Jeffrey E. Sussna writes:
[on the omissibility of rdf:RDF]
> I took it the same way. But doesn't that violate the principle of
> XML as being self-describing?
First, there is no such published principle for XML itself, though the
Namespaces spec provides an infrastructure for such a thing.
Second, it in no way violates it, because if you recognise the
namespaces/elements being used, you can still figure out that you're
dealing with RDF (and if not, fat lot of good they'll do you anyway).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|