Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: James Robertson <email@example.com>
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:40:03 +1000
At 11:21 25/03/1999 , Steve Oldmeadow wrote:
| >At 03:08 25/03/1999 , JPA wrote:
| > | Hello,
| > |
| > | I'm currently working on an xml convertor-generator. When
| > | tool will, if you take the bother to type the structure of your input
| > | format and mappings on entities and attributes, construct a convertor.
| > | There's no documentation as yet, and some stuff missing (escaping, for
| > | one thing), but if there's enough interest I'll put it on a website as
| > | is.
| > |
| > |
| > | Paul Janssens - email@example.com
| >Not wishing to rain on your parade, but aren't
| >you re-inventing the wheel here?
| >Will your solution do anything that Perl or
| >Omnimark can't already do?
| With that sort of attitude XML would never have gotten off the ground.
| and OmniMark??? You must be a masochist.
I can think of two situations:
1. You want to develop a new conversion tool, either for
the kudos, or for the money. If so, go for it.
But be warned, conversion tools need to be powerful in order
to be useful (I should know, I spend most of my life
converting to and from SGML/XML).
2. You have a practical problem to solve that involves converting
files to XML.
If so, why on earth wouldn't you use existing off-the-shelf tools
to do the work? Especially if they are freely available.
Now, from the original e-mail, I assumed case 2, but I
could be wrong.
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)