[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:29:27 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
> > Possible solutions:
> >
> > - reject normalize-text true if a LexicalHandler has been registered,
> > and reject LexicalHandler registration if normalize-text has been set
> > to true
> > - make normalize-text have a logical interpretation by default, and
> > switch to lexical if a LexicalHandler has been registered
> > - make normalize-text always have a lexical interpretation
> > - have separate normalize-text-logical and normalize-text-lexical
> > events, with reject-behaviour for the first
>
> The DOM's text-normalisation feature does *not* normalise CDATA
> sections, but I think that SAX's should
Do you mean always normalize CDATA or normalize CDATA in the absense of a
LexicalHandler? I agree with the first case, but prefer Lars' second
option (lexical interpretation of normalization) in the second case. By
requesting normalize, the application has asked for a single call to
character() between other calls. By registering a LexicalHandler, the
application has stated it is still interested in lexical events.
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
