Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <email@example.com>
- To: "Tim Bray" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Dan Brickley" <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>, <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:05:25 -0500
Tim Bray wrote:
> At 08:54 PM 3/25/99 +0000, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >Quite so. But there are still initiatives such as
> > http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical.htm
> > http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical1.1/WBXML-03-Feb-1999.pdf
> I read some of it, and if you buy the idea that a binary form of XML
> is useful, it seems quite sensible. I'm agnostic; if they think they
> need it who are we to tell them they don't? Obviously it has to
> round-trip with plain ole XML. -T.
I think what this really is, when you strip out the concept of binary XML,
is a suggestion for a compression format tuned for markup streams.
There are two distinct issues 1) efficiency of parsing 2) compactness. A
standard compression format for XML (ala zip,gzip etc) would be for
bandwidth limited applications.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)