[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
- To: "xml-dev@ic.ac.uk" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:42:42 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
> It's worthwhile, perhaps, to ask whether there will be many XML
> applications that
>
> a) require a small footprint;
> b) need DTD information; and
> c) can use the information in a streaming format.
Point (c) is the one that gets me. All the DTD-based applications I can
think of eventually need a set of objects over the DTD because they are
either analyzing the DTD or continually checking against it.
The only exception I can think of to this is Simon's validation routine in
his layered parser, and he needs so much lexical information he's likely to
be unhappy with an event-based DTD parser anyway. (A quick and dirty fix
would be to redefine validation to mean logical validation, not physical
validation.)
(By the way, can we change ContentParticle.isOmissible to isOptional? I
had to think a bit before I realized what isOmissible meant.)
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|