Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <email@example.com>
- To: "XML List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 10:53:31 +0200
Paul Prescod <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Both XML-QL and XQL have ways to construct results (CONSTRUCT and
>There is no such element type described in
Sorry, you are right, of course. I've picked it up from one of the papers of
the QL conference -
>> I'd also add:
>> - We should have separate specs for XQL, XTL, and FOs. The XTL spec
>> simply reference the XQL spec. The FO spec should be independent.
>Techically a good idea but I think that it is politically impossible to
>separate XSL and its matching language at this point. Maybe XSL 2.0 will
>depend on whatever XML QL is eventually standardized.
>> - XQL should be used wherever a set of XML elements needs to be selected
>> from an XML tree.
>> - So therefore CSS should allow using XQL in its selectors. For that
>> CSS should allow an XML syntax :-)
>> - And also XPointers?
>I agree with all of this but changes to CSS are unlikely in the
Not to mention the chances of unifying XPointers and XQL - technically a
sound notion (even if the "XPointer" version is limited to selecting a
continuous portion of the tree), but highly unlikely.
I find it disturbing that something such as XML which is about as "new
technology" as you can be is already suffering from so much
backward-compatibility and "historical reason" warts. XSL which has never
even seen version 1.0 is already showing these symptoms!
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)