[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:53:12 -0700
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> At 03:57 PM 4/15/99 -0700, Andrew Layman wrote:
> >The XML specification contains a non-normative (meaning "not-a-requirement")
> >section dealing with non-deterministic content models. Perhaps the parsers
> >in question enforce determinism.
>
> I think it's normative. I don't agree with it and think it should be
> done away with, but I do think it's normative. -Tim
In section 3.2.1 it says "for compatibility, it is an error..." and
points at Appendix E, "Non-Deterministic Content Models (Non-Normative)"
for details. Seems to me that 3.2.1 is normative.
However, in translation, that means that processors may do pretty much
whatever they like there ... but documents mustn't depend on such DTD
constructs ever working, or even being detected by an XML processor.
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
