[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- To: jelks@jelks.nu
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 21:17:38 +0200
Jelks Cabaniss wrote:
> But how to do it? If XML 1.1 has a "valid='yes'|'no'" in the declaration, XML
> 1.1 documents may break when running under an XML 1.0 parser, since the XML 1.0
> BNF clearly states what can and can't be in the declaration.
But they would also notice the version="1.1" as well, and either stop or
ignore stuff they didn't understand...
> Maybe a PI could be formalized similar to the way the stylesheet linking is
> being done:
>
> <?xml-assert implementation="valid"?>
>
> (could also be "minimal" or "full" for the well-formed only options you
> mentioned).
I think the chance of doing this extension via a PI is minimal.
--
Chris
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
