Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Andrew Layman <email@example.com>
- To: "xml-dev Mailing List (E-mail)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:33:26 -0700
Regarding use of elements versus attributes, Andy Dent wrote "The path that
Microsoft seem to be following with XML-Data is to use elements ... My
single biggest problem with this is the reuse of elements within other
elements - you can't define an element with local 'scope'. What happens when
Amount is an i2 in one context and a float in another?"
At http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/microsoft-serializing.html you'll find
a description of a style of using XML in which attributes play a major role,
specifically to avoid the problem you mention with local scope.
This particular style is designed for representing graphs of typed objects
in named relations using currently-available tools and technology. If
Microsoft's advocacy of this seems less than dogmatic, it is because other
contexts may reasonably call for other styles.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)