[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
- To: "'XML-Dev Mailing list'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 12:42:39 +0200
I was reading the XML spec on the way to work today (sometimes traffic jams
combined with a PalmV are a real blessing :)) and realised that my Apache
XML charset sniffer might be in error. By default it returns application/xml
as the mime type, but it returns it as:
application/xml; charset=xyz
Which now, according to everything I know about http and now the XML spec
seems wrong. If I'm returning application/xml I shouldn't return a charset
at all - that's up to the end application. I should only return a charset if
the user wants to return text/xml.
Is that the consensus on this list?
Does returning a charset for application/xml do any harm? Does it do any
good?
Matt.
--
http://come.to/fastnet
Perl on Win32, PerlScript, ASP, Database, XML
GCS(GAT) d+ s:+ a-- C++ UL++>UL+++$ P++++$ E- W+++ N++ w--@$ O- M-- !V
!PS !PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5 R tv+ X++ b+ DI++ D G-- e++ h--->z+++ R+++
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|