Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 11:29:46 -0400
Ronald Bourret wrote:
> > I agree with Paul 100% on this one. For precisely this reason, DDML
> > remained entity free for a very long time (though I got outvoted on
> > unparsed entities in the end.)
> As one of those who helped outvote Simon, I'd just like to say that I have
> completely recanted. Including unparsed entity definitions in DDML was a
> mistake and I now regret it.
I remain unreconstructed.
If we are to have validatable ENTITY/ENTITIES attributes, then
we must have unparsed entity declarations as well. Either
lose both or keep both, say I.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)