Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Joshua E. Smith" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 11:46:39 -0400
I have an element which can contain 0 or more instances of some element
types (call these collections), and 0 or 1 instances of others (call these
singletons), and I don't want to contrain the order.
If I have collections C1, C2, C3
and I have singletons S1, S2, S3
And I declare:
(S1? , S2? , S3? , (C1 | C2 | C3)*)
Then the singletons, if they appear, would have to be in that order and
would have to be first. So that's not what I want.
I suppose I could declare some combinatorics:
( S1? | S2? | S3? | (S1 , S2)? | (S2 , S1)? | (S1 , S3)? blah blah blah
but I'd have to mix in the C1, C2, C3, etc., too, and I have about 8
singleton classes, so this would quickly get totally out of control.
Am I missing something, or is what I want to describe not really practical
in a DTD? I'm perfectly comfortable leaving the singletonness out of my
DTD (my application will detect duplication errors anyway), if that's the
only answer. But if there *is* a way to capture this without waiting for
XSchema to be finished, I'd love to hear it!
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)