Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 21:01:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Paul Prescod wrote:
Paul Prescod <email@example.com> wrote:
> Don Park wrote:
> > Thanks for clearing that up. Do you what the folks who "regard PIs as
> > problematic second-class syntax" recommend for first-class out-of-band
> > signaling mechanism? I wouldn't mind giving up PI if there was an
> > alternative.
> Well, Liam Quin has been a constant critic of processing instructions.
Heh... I always wanted to be remembered for something :-)
Well, if you read these -- especially the second -- you'll see that
they are not arguments against processing instructions. The 2nd
article argues against using a processing instruction to link a
document to its style sheet in a way that was incompatible with
the then current XLink draft, and also incompatible with the DOM.
> [Paul's] response:
> As I said in that message, the important thing about processing
> instructions is that they are invisible to content models.
Yes. This can be good and bad. There's been a tendency in the SGML
world to use them like significant comments -- if you've ever seen a
large document with <?Pub Stuff> scattered all over it, you'll know
what I mean. The usual reaction is that people in such environments
write scripts to remove all the processing instructions.
> If XML Schemas
> invented a way to make elements invisible to content models (like SGML's
> inclusion exceptions, but maybe only allowed at the top level) and a way
> to add these inclusions to existing schemas easily then processing
> instructions could be replaced by these "floating", element types. That
> would be neat.
I agree, and in some ways this could be where namespaces go, I think.
> But if there are no floating element types then we still need processing
Well, you don't need them in a formal sense, but I agree there there is
very strong motivation for them :-)
Liam Quin, independent SGML/XML/Unix/perl consultant
l i a m q u i n at i n t e r l o g dot c o m
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)