[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: 16 May 1999 00:07:49 +0200
* Jeffrey Ricker
|
| Why did Netscape feel it necessary to invent RSS rather than use CDF
| as Microsoft, DataChannel, PointCast, etc. do?
When I first started looking at RSS I immediately noticed two things:
a) it's incredibly simple (too simple, in fact)
b) it's probably the most widely supported XML application so far,
both in terms of software and content
To me this smells like worse-is-better again, and I think that's a
good answer to your question.
I also think it's a useful lesson for the future. The success of most
non-local XML applications is entirely dependent on their adoption by
content providers, and previous experience seems to show that that
very much depends on how easy it is to support.
I would also conjecture that in most cases the software support
depends on the content support.
--Lars M.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
