[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 10:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
Oren Ben-Kiki writes:
> W3C features are different in two important respects. First, these
> are features one _must_ use to comply with "official standards".
Actually, that's not the case. W3C standards may be interdependent,
but they are not a package deal -- for example, I can use XML with a
format other than RDF for exchanging metadata (and in the future, RDF
may use serialization formats other than XML). I can use Perl, Java,
Python, DSSSL, or or what-have-you to transform or render XML
documents without becoming in any way non-conformant. I can look at
XML documents through any API (though SAX and the DOM are good for
general-purpose work), and I can set up linking any way I want.
I don't think that it was ever the W3C's intention to say that XSLT is
the only way that people should transform XML documents; if so, I
strongly object.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|