Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@icl.com>
- To: XML Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 10:37:57 +0100
> Gak, what a thought. Can we really use tools that differ by
> a complexity of 100 from other tools? Consider the idea of
> a programming language 100 times simpler than C, or 100 times
> more complex than Standard C++. Can the mind really grasp
> such a thing?
Remember PL/I? (My mind couldn't grasp it, but I guess others could).
The SQL 1986 standard was 104 pages long. The 1992 standard was 607 pages. I
don't have a final copy of SQL3 but my draft copy (a couple of years old) is
What's the ratio for XML:SGML?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)