[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
- To: "Carl Hage" <carl@chage.com>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:40:10 +0800
> Turn it around-- it would be intrinsically <em>good</em> to require
> all namespaces to reference a retrievable document.
But this is what started my whole point. How do you distinguish the "thing"
from the "retrievable document"? It isn't so much a problem with namespaces
because the "Creator" of a namespace is pretty much going to be the
"Creator" of the descriptive document.But consider your example of using:
http://isbn.org/isbn/1-57595-180-0B
to refer to a book *and* to the MARC record. The "Creator" of the book is
the author but the "Creator" of the MARC record probably someone else. But
THEY HAVE THE SAME URL!
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
