Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "'XML Dev'" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 22:47:35 -0400
Paul Prescod wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
> > At 12:47 PM 5/31/99 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > >> > Using HTTP for URIs sounds intrinsically <em>bad</em> to me. ...
> > >Well, the first problem is that it is wrong: it is in violation of IETF
> > >specifications about the semantics of http: URLs. Personally,
> I think that
> > >standards incompliance should be argument enough.
> > No. The IETF docs explain how a URI may be used to reference a resource
> > on the Web. They further say that URIs are in fact designed to
> > this process. There is nothing in there I've seen stating that
> they *must*
> > be so used, nor that they may not be used for other purposes. Or am
> > I missing something? -Tim
> I'm talking specifically about the definition of HTTP URLs.
> "The HTTP URL scheme is used to designate Internet resources accessible
> using HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol)."
> (I guess from a formal logic perspective it should end with "and no
> If you use them to designate non-Internet resources NOT accessible by HTTP
> then I consider that an obvious abuse, even if the HTTP spec. isn't
> sufficiently anal to disallow the practice from a formal logic
I still fail to see what actual, current and/or practical problem this
creates with respect to XML namespaces?
> If we take advantage of this formal logic loophole then the elephants can
> come barging through.
What elephants will come barging through where and what will they do when
they get there?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)