[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- To: XML Dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 18:37:10 -0400
Paul Prescod wrote:
> 1. don't worry about it. We'll have other URN mechanisms soon and today's
> harvesters won't recognize urn:urn-22:foo@bar.com:blah anyhow.
I suspect this is false, and that harvesters will recognize
"foo@bar.com" embedded in any text.
> I am leaning toward option 2.
I like option 2 also.
"I do not like this URNish spam! I do not like it, Sam-I-am!"
"There was only one URN -- but that was URN-22."
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
