[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:32:02 -0700
> really?
> In, w3c's document, the following statements appear.
> - this results in all the child nodes of the DocumentFragment being
> moved to the child list of this node.
> Umm, above "moved" word means what?
> copy-and-paste or cut-and-paste?
Cut and paste.
> The class that I had developed in java has DocumentFragment Object,
> and this class's publish() method insert this DocumentFragment into
> root Document's any Node. after invoking publish() method,
> is it correct this class's DocumentFragment member has no child nodes?
> or not.
The only purpose of having DocumentFragment in the DOM API is to have
children for adoption via insertChild/appendNode. It is just a placeholder
for nodes which are 'owned' by a Document but not yet part of the Document
tree.
> If the original node's of DocumentFragment remained in
> DocumentFragment
> object, I can change the DocumentFragment's childnode's.
huh? They are moved, cut-and-pasted, out of the DocumentFragment and into
the target node.
> How Current well-known DOM implementaions handles it?
> especially OpenXML?
*shrug*
Best,
Don
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
