Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Chris Lilley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Paul Prescod <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 14:35:17 +0200
Paul Prescod wrote:
> James Tauber wrote:
> > 1. Namespace URIs don't have to point to anything retrievable, they are just
> > unique identifiers
> > 2. Some URI schemes might not be web-retrievable (eg "isbn:1-23456-789-0")
> > 3. Some URI schemes *are* web-retrievable (eg http://www.megginson.com/ns/)
> > 4. So namespaces URIs *can* point to something, though, such as a
> > human-readable description of the namespace, if they use a URI scheme that
> > is web-retrievable.
> It strikes me as clearly poor design to use an HTTP url for something not
> retrievable by the HTTP protocol.
It would be, but no such examples were given.
I suspect that the "isbn" protocol example would be better written
urn:isbn:whatever - but regardless, it did not claim to be using the
> I am distressed that this is becoming
> "standard practice." How the heck are we supposed to know, on seeing a URI
> whether it is supposed to be retrievable or not?
Look at the protocol part and see if you understand that protocol.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)